<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Press Release Is Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missingfeatures.com/2007/11/15/the-press-release-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missingfeatures.com/2007/11/15/the-press-release-is-dead/</link>
	<description>Web sites, web apps, software, and usability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.missingfeatures.com/2007/11/15/the-press-release-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missingfeatures.com/2007/11/15/the-press-release-is-dead/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Interesting point. As for â€œmethod intended to reach the public on a broad, non-exclusionary basis, such as a press release.â€, that IS the blog. It&#039;s even more non-exclusionary than a press release.

The blog is the press release.

I suppose you could include the text required by law in the posts that directly related to earnings.

Ultimately your goal is to spread the word about your announcement, so I would argue you want the most distributable format possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point. As for â€œmethod intended to reach the public on a broad, non-exclusionary basis, such as a press release.â€, that IS the blog. It&#8217;s even more non-exclusionary than a press release.</p>
<p>The blog is the press release.</p>
<p>I suppose you could include the text required by law in the posts that directly related to earnings.</p>
<p>Ultimately your goal is to spread the word about your announcement, so I would argue you want the most distributable format possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H2OTown</title>
		<link>http://www.missingfeatures.com/2007/11/15/the-press-release-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>H2OTown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missingfeatures.com/2007/11/15/the-press-release-is-dead/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>While your perspective is interesting, it&#039;s forgetting a major point.  For publicly-traded companies, a news release is a required vehicle for communicating material company news.  The guidelines set by the SEC (Regulation Fair Disclosure) require companies to communicate information through a &quot;method intended to reach the public on a broad, nonexclusionary basis, such as a press release.&quot;

As for the content... a lot of that is dictated by lawyers.  Every public company must include a safe harbor statement warning investors of forward-looking statements in the news release and any potential risks to their investment.

While the idea of a company blog sounds great in theory, in practice, a public company would have too many constraints on what they could include since discussing material information on a blog would be a violation of SEC rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your perspective is interesting, it&#8217;s forgetting a major point.  For publicly-traded companies, a news release is a required vehicle for communicating material company news.  The guidelines set by the SEC (Regulation Fair Disclosure) require companies to communicate information through a &#8220;method intended to reach the public on a broad, nonexclusionary basis, such as a press release.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for the content&#8230; a lot of that is dictated by lawyers.  Every public company must include a safe harbor statement warning investors of forward-looking statements in the news release and any potential risks to their investment.</p>
<p>While the idea of a company blog sounds great in theory, in practice, a public company would have too many constraints on what they could include since discussing material information on a blog would be a violation of SEC rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

